I told you so...
Big hit to the shittiest soccer league in the world. All that exposure, all that revenue and media fancy...gone in a flash. Brilliant.
Thursday, February 5, 2009
Wednesday, February 4, 2009
Just a thought...
So just because Mr. Obama owned up to a mistake he never should have made, he deserves to be pardoned based on the premise that if one admits wrong doing they receive less scrutiny?
....Well sorry Mr. Officer, I did kill that man but I do believe I made a mistake and a terrible error of judgment. Instead of arresting me for murder, a simple slap on the wrist and I'll be a changed man.
There isn't much room for error when your at the top, just ask Greg Norman about the 1996 masters. There is even less room when the US economy is on the brink of catastrophe. People should be more demanding of the man they voted in to "change" the world.
....Well sorry Mr. Officer, I did kill that man but I do believe I made a mistake and a terrible error of judgment. Instead of arresting me for murder, a simple slap on the wrist and I'll be a changed man.
There isn't much room for error when your at the top, just ask Greg Norman about the 1996 masters. There is even less room when the US economy is on the brink of catastrophe. People should be more demanding of the man they voted in to "change" the world.
Tuesday, February 3, 2009
For old time sake
I think after this I will be done ragging on Taliban Jack, but I need one more kick at this before I bow out on communist fools.
By Jack Layton's logic, the conservatives shouldn't be in power because the majority of Canadians voted to not have the Conservatives in power. (This of course would be the case with all Canadian gov'ts for over 20 years... but let's put that aside)
This logic of course assumes that you are defined not by what you are for but by what you oppose. By the same extension of logic Jack Layton, who received around 20,000 votes in his riding, should not have won because approximately 25,000 people voted against him. Of course, that's ridiculous just as it ridiculous to assume that the majority of Canadians voted for the Dr Frankenstein attempt to form a government.
Those who are in this logic bracket probably shouldn't be so niave. Mr. Layton figures that even though he faced the same voting situation, it doesn't matter because "most" of Canada wants a coalition. Again this is based on his own logic, and not based on facts raised in the polls and the genral outcry by anyone other then other fellow commies. I guess he is still certain the most Canadians are dumb. Problem is, he doesn't realize it is only his own party that cannot understand proper logical, and non-hyprcritical arguements. Furthermore, it seems he cannot even lead the idiots to glory.
But this is the guy who we should trust to lead Canadians in tough econmoic times....amirite?
By Jack Layton's logic, the conservatives shouldn't be in power because the majority of Canadians voted to not have the Conservatives in power. (This of course would be the case with all Canadian gov'ts for over 20 years... but let's put that aside)
This logic of course assumes that you are defined not by what you are for but by what you oppose. By the same extension of logic Jack Layton, who received around 20,000 votes in his riding, should not have won because approximately 25,000 people voted against him. Of course, that's ridiculous just as it ridiculous to assume that the majority of Canadians voted for the Dr Frankenstein attempt to form a government.
Those who are in this logic bracket probably shouldn't be so niave. Mr. Layton figures that even though he faced the same voting situation, it doesn't matter because "most" of Canada wants a coalition. Again this is based on his own logic, and not based on facts raised in the polls and the genral outcry by anyone other then other fellow commies. I guess he is still certain the most Canadians are dumb. Problem is, he doesn't realize it is only his own party that cannot understand proper logical, and non-hyprcritical arguements. Furthermore, it seems he cannot even lead the idiots to glory.
But this is the guy who we should trust to lead Canadians in tough econmoic times....amirite?
The best idea ever
So during my musings today and a good article in the National Post i read, I figured that instead of putting 817 Billion dollars into the American economy, split up so many ways its a wonder it would even stimulate, I figure we could put all the money into the beer industry. With some inspiration from this column, I would like to expand on this thought. Before you stop reading, take the time too look at all the jobs this would create:
Obviously there are jobs such as Brewers, Hops farmers and other essentials in the beer making process. Let us look at, however, the indirect job creation that would be created.
-Transportation. Would need more trucks and trailers to transport these goods.
- We would need more truck manufacturers to make the steel and rod and tires and everything that would go into making sufficient means of transportation for this beer.
- More steel plants would have to be created, think world war two, on a smaller scale of course, but still, more jobs are more jobs
-Architects. How else will you design the buildings?
-Teachers...To train the architects.
-More workers to for the newly implemented steel plants. More drivers to transport the beer. More people to dispatch the drivers. More teachers to train more architects. More teachers to train more teachers to train more teachers.
Furthermore, how many more jobs would be created even more indirectly....
-Policemen
-Paramedics
-Doctors
-Casket Makers...The forestry industry would benefit because of this
-Funeral home Attendants
-People to construct many more breathalyzers
-Nurses
-More Insurances agencies
-People to run AA meetings
-All the necessary training would have to be provided by teachers, and I have already explained that process and all the job creation there.
-Someone to look after all those Budweiser Clydesdale's we saw in all those Super Bowl commercials.
-More fast food spots because all these fat beer drinkers need to eat right?
There are consequences of this type of stimulus package, as you can see, but a job is a job correct? You wouldn't even have to charge much for the beer. Because of the vast volume that would be made, and the relatively cheap cost to produce, you just have to get people in the door. Kinda like a Detroit Red Wings game.
It's funny, a stimulus package is created to stimulate the economy, to stabilize it. Why not thwart stimulating and just go balls to the wall and get rich quick. It's so crazy it just might work.
Obviously there are jobs such as Brewers, Hops farmers and other essentials in the beer making process. Let us look at, however, the indirect job creation that would be created.
-Transportation. Would need more trucks and trailers to transport these goods.
- We would need more truck manufacturers to make the steel and rod and tires and everything that would go into making sufficient means of transportation for this beer.
- More steel plants would have to be created, think world war two, on a smaller scale of course, but still, more jobs are more jobs
-Architects. How else will you design the buildings?
-Teachers...To train the architects.
-More workers to for the newly implemented steel plants. More drivers to transport the beer. More people to dispatch the drivers. More teachers to train more architects. More teachers to train more teachers to train more teachers.
Furthermore, how many more jobs would be created even more indirectly....
-Policemen
-Paramedics
-Doctors
-Casket Makers...The forestry industry would benefit because of this
-Funeral home Attendants
-People to construct many more breathalyzers
-Nurses
-More Insurances agencies
-People to run AA meetings
-All the necessary training would have to be provided by teachers, and I have already explained that process and all the job creation there.
-Someone to look after all those Budweiser Clydesdale's we saw in all those Super Bowl commercials.
-More fast food spots because all these fat beer drinkers need to eat right?
There are consequences of this type of stimulus package, as you can see, but a job is a job correct? You wouldn't even have to charge much for the beer. Because of the vast volume that would be made, and the relatively cheap cost to produce, you just have to get people in the door. Kinda like a Detroit Red Wings game.
It's funny, a stimulus package is created to stimulate the economy, to stabilize it. Why not thwart stimulating and just go balls to the wall and get rich quick. It's so crazy it just might work.
Friday, January 30, 2009
You Don't Know Jack!
Keep praying Jack, and please don't cry. Nothing was more satisfying in these last couple of days then the scenes of Jack Layton knowing that hes was royally screwed. His anger looked like jealousy, and I couldn't help but laugh out loud. Dumb enough to think a coalition would still work with highly educated Liberal leader, Layton got a rude awakening when Ignatieff gave him the Heisman on national T.V. Brilliant was it? Yes, yes it was. In a democratic and free country, even the Liberals know that the Communist ways of the NDP brASS don't fit into society. Certainly they don't fit into their plans of trying to oust the conservatives. But why oust a minority that they can somewhat control. Moreso, why join forces with two parties that are so far off what Canada needs and plunge their party into even more turmoil then it currently is.
So long Jack, as of now, you are completely irrelevant to Canadians. I think you underestimated Canadians, Jack. Didn't you figure out they aren't all as dumb as you? Like the title says, I guess you don't know Jack.
Yet another FAIL
"'Buy American' rule in U.S. stimulus bill could cost Canada jobs" - cbc.ca
Obama was elected in on the premise that he would take down barriers, not create more of them.
This is the funny thing about politicians and the American people. Whether or not this is a race issue or a popularity contest, it is not going to take long for Americans to realize that the only change that has happened was that for a few weeks Americans held this false hope that one man could change many problems almost over night.
Of course, because he promised he would, he deserves all the criticism that he is receiving, only a week into his Presidency.
Obama was elected in on the premise that he would take down barriers, not create more of them.
This is the funny thing about politicians and the American people. Whether or not this is a race issue or a popularity contest, it is not going to take long for Americans to realize that the only change that has happened was that for a few weeks Americans held this false hope that one man could change many problems almost over night.
Of course, because he promised he would, he deserves all the criticism that he is receiving, only a week into his Presidency.
Saturday, January 24, 2009
FAIL
Two days ago Mr. Obama made a rule that would be tough against Lobbyists entering his Administration. Flash forward to this weekend, Obama now wants a waiver to his own rule. FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THINGS, YOUR BREAKING RULES ALREADY? AND THIS ONE WAS YOUR OWN????!!?? William Lynn is the man who Obama wants in, and to do so is asking for a waiver to his own rule.
(Best part about this is CNN is raggin' him, how they have changed their tune in two weeks LOL)
The American people are cynical enough and now they have this to contend with, as well as Obama straying away from "I will make change" to "I will try to make change, but I'm not so conifident anymore, but oh well, I am here for 4 years now so who cares, right?"
A pathetic display, but hey, you voted America!
(Best part about this is CNN is raggin' him, how they have changed their tune in two weeks LOL)
The American people are cynical enough and now they have this to contend with, as well as Obama straying away from "I will make change" to "I will try to make change, but I'm not so conifident anymore, but oh well, I am here for 4 years now so who cares, right?"
A pathetic display, but hey, you voted America!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)