For the the whiners and critics and the people who bitch and moan about another conservative government.
CANADA HAS SPOKEN, DEAL WITH IT.
And if you wanna blame someone blame yourself. Blame yourself for the record low amount of people that voted. Blame yourself for not caring about Canada on TV then watching something that effects you. And blame yourself for being naive and ignorant to Canada.
As a Conservative I'm happy they won, and even more happy when i see all the whiners come out in vast numbers this morning. You probably didn't vote, probably didn't concern yourself with the issues, and probably couldn't care less. You don't deserve to whine and moan, you don't deserve to take issues in the matter of our government and you make no difference in this world whatsoever.
And please don't tell me your vote wouldn't have counted, there were a lot of tight races. And were talking almost half of Canada could have still voted. It's a shame really.
On the other hand, thank you half-of-Canada for not voting in Communism and thank you for not raising the price of fuel. I guess some credit is deserved.
GO HARPER!!!!!!!!!!
Wednesday, October 15, 2008
Thursday, October 9, 2008
A majority makes sense...
Times like these call for a majority government. With the economic crisis that is hitting the states and other countries abroad, a government with the ability to make decisions without having to lean on other parties with differing opinions is of greater importance then ever before.
Whether you agree with the Conservatives or not, a majority government will give Canada the tools it needs to stabilize the economy before we have USA 2.0. If we do end up with another minority government, there is going to be a struggle when it comes to passing economic laws and reforms that would better the country. Whether you believe it or not, a Conservative Majority isn't going to run Canada into the ground. It is the only Platform it seems that isn't using scare tactics as a major part of their campaign.
Harper is young, ambitious and very effective. If you look at his record over that past two and a half years you can see the evidence of this. He has stuck to his original platform for taxes and crime. He has made steady strides in Child care as well. He has remained steadfast in his role, and unlike the previous government, he has remained pretty much scandal-free for the duration of his tenure.
Without a majority, Harper will have a tough time controlling the house and passing economic reforms to keep Canada out of a recession. Layton and Dion will compromise Canada before they will save it, and that's just the way it is. They will sabotage Harper and in turn Canada as well because political gain is more important to them then Canadians financial situations. Furthermore they will blame it all on Harper, and Canadians will buy it because, lets face it, some are stupid, examples of this are voting for the NDP.
The case for a majority is strong, Canada needs it right now, the Canadian people need it. More political uncertainty will not help the economy. We need a strong leadership, one that the Conservatives have proven again and again. We need a leadership that has ambitions for Canada, one that will be conservative in spending and not try and tax the living hell out of Canadians. We need a leadership that will be effective in spending and not rely on the money tree to fund 50 billion dollars that we don't have.
Canada needs the Conservatives to be a majority, otherwise we might as well merge with the US.
Whether you agree with the Conservatives or not, a majority government will give Canada the tools it needs to stabilize the economy before we have USA 2.0. If we do end up with another minority government, there is going to be a struggle when it comes to passing economic laws and reforms that would better the country. Whether you believe it or not, a Conservative Majority isn't going to run Canada into the ground. It is the only Platform it seems that isn't using scare tactics as a major part of their campaign.
Harper is young, ambitious and very effective. If you look at his record over that past two and a half years you can see the evidence of this. He has stuck to his original platform for taxes and crime. He has made steady strides in Child care as well. He has remained steadfast in his role, and unlike the previous government, he has remained pretty much scandal-free for the duration of his tenure.
Without a majority, Harper will have a tough time controlling the house and passing economic reforms to keep Canada out of a recession. Layton and Dion will compromise Canada before they will save it, and that's just the way it is. They will sabotage Harper and in turn Canada as well because political gain is more important to them then Canadians financial situations. Furthermore they will blame it all on Harper, and Canadians will buy it because, lets face it, some are stupid, examples of this are voting for the NDP.
The case for a majority is strong, Canada needs it right now, the Canadian people need it. More political uncertainty will not help the economy. We need a strong leadership, one that the Conservatives have proven again and again. We need a leadership that has ambitions for Canada, one that will be conservative in spending and not try and tax the living hell out of Canadians. We need a leadership that will be effective in spending and not rely on the money tree to fund 50 billion dollars that we don't have.
Canada needs the Conservatives to be a majority, otherwise we might as well merge with the US.
Sunday, October 5, 2008
You don't know Jack...
http://www.nationalpost.com/news/canada/election-2008/story.html?id=846352&p=2
Some people just scratch the service, never finding out whats underneath...
Some people just scratch the service, never finding out whats underneath...
Why to never Vote for the Liberals again...
Department of Defense Fraud: $159 million Scandal 05/23/2005
Whistleblower-Government Reclocation Contract. Scandal 05/14/2005
Un-tendered contract Bombardier: $100 million Scandal 04/10/2005
Misuse of pension funds not criminal Questionable Spending 07/01/2005
Submarine Purchase Questionable Spending 04/11/2005
Saddam one million dollars in Paul Martin-owned Cordex Scandal 04/24/2005
Income trust - possible insider trading leak to friends. Scandal 11/29/2005
Quebec Sponsorship Fraud: $250 million + Scandal 05/23/2005
Canada Lands? Fire Sale Pricing Potential Scandal 04/30/2005
Under funded Armed Forces: $Billions Promises 04/11/2005
Allegations of judicial appointments Scandal 05/04/2005
Toilet Paper Purchase: $36 million Scandal 04/11/2005
Vote buying in Parliment Scandal 05/19/2005
Jean Chretien Shawinigate: $780 thousand Scandal 04/11/2005
Another Scandal Goes to Court Scandal 06/19/2005
RCMP lay charges in Immigration Scandal Scandal 05/04/2005
$7000 for 31 Meals Questionable Spending 09/21/2005
Radwanski: Under police investigation Scandal 04/11/2005
Canadian Media covers up Bill Graham is Bisexual Scandal 11/11/2005
Aboriginal Affairs Spending Questionable Spending 04/11/2005
Sponsorship Scandal
Gun Regestry Scandal
Whistleblower-Government Reclocation Contract. Scandal 05/14/2005
Un-tendered contract Bombardier: $100 million Scandal 04/10/2005
Misuse of pension funds not criminal Questionable Spending 07/01/2005
Submarine Purchase Questionable Spending 04/11/2005
Saddam one million dollars in Paul Martin-owned Cordex Scandal 04/24/2005
Income trust - possible insider trading leak to friends. Scandal 11/29/2005
Quebec Sponsorship Fraud: $250 million + Scandal 05/23/2005
Canada Lands? Fire Sale Pricing Potential Scandal 04/30/2005
Under funded Armed Forces: $Billions Promises 04/11/2005
Allegations of judicial appointments Scandal 05/04/2005
Toilet Paper Purchase: $36 million Scandal 04/11/2005
Vote buying in Parliment Scandal 05/19/2005
Jean Chretien Shawinigate: $780 thousand Scandal 04/11/2005
Another Scandal Goes to Court Scandal 06/19/2005
RCMP lay charges in Immigration Scandal Scandal 05/04/2005
$7000 for 31 Meals Questionable Spending 09/21/2005
Radwanski: Under police investigation Scandal 04/11/2005
Canadian Media covers up Bill Graham is Bisexual Scandal 11/11/2005
Aboriginal Affairs Spending Questionable Spending 04/11/2005
Sponsorship Scandal
Gun Regestry Scandal
Friday, October 3, 2008
The debate
I found myself watching the debates last night with a buddy of mine, and while we shared a few jokes, I was enthralled by it.
Things that I noted last night:
1. No one gave a flying F--- about the questions asked. While Mr. Harper answered the questions posed to him, the other clowns would give a one-liner and then immediately attack Harper and a plethora of issues, half the time not even pertaining to the question posed by the viewer.
2. Jack Layton is retarded. This guy knows he won't win, so he does everything he can possibly do to promote his communist ways in front of 30 million Canadians that couldn't care less about his stupid and unrealistic ideas. He did give me a good laugh when he questioned Dion's ability to lead the Liberal Party, but nonetheless, hes a commie. Instead of giving $500 dollars in tax cuts a year to Families to compensate for their children's various art programs, a plan proposed by the Tories, he wants to give $400 to families a year to keep them off the street. ??? Wouldn't the $500 be more beneficial to the cause? Not only is it $100 more, but it gives them incentive to send their kids to piano or dance lessons. Well thought out Jack!
3. Stephane Dion has less knowledge then the common chimp. Seriously, this guy can't barely speak the English language, yet he wants us to trust him with leadership of all Canadian people when he cannot put a coherent sentence together. Dion's Carbon tax is a fraud, no way in hell does that work in the Canadian Economy. He can make all the comparisions he wants to European countries. but difference in economy and currency and balance make those claims irrelevant. Dion's Idea of a "Fun Canada" is childish, his so-called appreciation of the Arts was less the believeable.
4. Gilles Duceppe, while irrelevant to anyone outside Quebec, is always good for a laugh. I laughed out loud at his poke at all the leaders when he said "I know I won't be prime minister and three of you won't be prime minister, neither," he said, gesturing at his colleagues around the table. "Some of you know it, but you won't say it." Pointing at Layton, Dion and May. Everything Duceppe days starts and ends with the noun Quebec. While he will never be a Prime Minister, he will always be good to stir the pot and then sit their and smirk. He has nothing to lose.
5. Elizebeth May. Completely Irrelevant. She got way to much time for having one seat in the house. Her campaign managers must have told her before she went in to say things that Canadians want to hear. So she sat there, completely lied to everyone in Canada, took what all the other parties wanted and molded them together and then said them out loud. She would pipe up with useless quips, even at the end of the debate when she was defending this debate over the Palin vs. Bidden. She gets a 1/10 for trying, and a 0/10 for material. None of it mattered.
6. Stephen Harper. Dude looked good after the apparent steam rolling he got. He knew what questions where coming his way, and responded to the criticisms by the other Parlimentarians rather well from what I saw. He dodged a few Bullets I'm sure Canadians would have rather had answered, but he remained steadfast in his ways. He outlined what the country has become in his short tenure as PM. He defended and even hit out at some of the things levied against him. He didnt have to do much, he wans't going to win or lose the election last night, so he remained calm for the most part and gave pre-planned answers in a safe and monotone way. I would have liked to see a platform from Harper, but does he need one right now? Many have pegged him with a huge margin victory from last night.
If anything last night, the Tories won on a couple fronts. There are two types of voters in Canada at this point. The first is the ones that know it will be a Torie Government. This will affect their voting, as some may not even do so. This hinders the Liberals and the NDP who would like to see those votes come their way. In turn this helps the Tories because they aren't losing any votes to the Liberals or the NDP. Pretty Simple, no?
The second train of thought is that the race is close. Close is good for all parties, but it helps the Tories out again, as long as these swing voters agree that the Liberal party is in shambles, this swing vote will go to a more compotent party, one that wont be calling another election or changing leaders in the next year. Moreso, if votes go the NDP way, then the Liberals will lose those votes. This is a two horse race, and most Liberals second vote would go to the NDP if not satisfied with their own party. This just helps the Majority that the Tories are yearning for.
I rather enjoyed the debate, i havent seen the numbers yet as far as viewers go, but i would hope that Canadians took some interest in what they complain about.
Things that I noted last night:
1. No one gave a flying F--- about the questions asked. While Mr. Harper answered the questions posed to him, the other clowns would give a one-liner and then immediately attack Harper and a plethora of issues, half the time not even pertaining to the question posed by the viewer.
2. Jack Layton is retarded. This guy knows he won't win, so he does everything he can possibly do to promote his communist ways in front of 30 million Canadians that couldn't care less about his stupid and unrealistic ideas. He did give me a good laugh when he questioned Dion's ability to lead the Liberal Party, but nonetheless, hes a commie. Instead of giving $500 dollars in tax cuts a year to Families to compensate for their children's various art programs, a plan proposed by the Tories, he wants to give $400 to families a year to keep them off the street. ??? Wouldn't the $500 be more beneficial to the cause? Not only is it $100 more, but it gives them incentive to send their kids to piano or dance lessons. Well thought out Jack!
3. Stephane Dion has less knowledge then the common chimp. Seriously, this guy can't barely speak the English language, yet he wants us to trust him with leadership of all Canadian people when he cannot put a coherent sentence together. Dion's Carbon tax is a fraud, no way in hell does that work in the Canadian Economy. He can make all the comparisions he wants to European countries. but difference in economy and currency and balance make those claims irrelevant. Dion's Idea of a "Fun Canada" is childish, his so-called appreciation of the Arts was less the believeable.
4. Gilles Duceppe, while irrelevant to anyone outside Quebec, is always good for a laugh. I laughed out loud at his poke at all the leaders when he said "I know I won't be prime minister and three of you won't be prime minister, neither," he said, gesturing at his colleagues around the table. "Some of you know it, but you won't say it." Pointing at Layton, Dion and May. Everything Duceppe days starts and ends with the noun Quebec. While he will never be a Prime Minister, he will always be good to stir the pot and then sit their and smirk. He has nothing to lose.
5. Elizebeth May. Completely Irrelevant. She got way to much time for having one seat in the house. Her campaign managers must have told her before she went in to say things that Canadians want to hear. So she sat there, completely lied to everyone in Canada, took what all the other parties wanted and molded them together and then said them out loud. She would pipe up with useless quips, even at the end of the debate when she was defending this debate over the Palin vs. Bidden. She gets a 1/10 for trying, and a 0/10 for material. None of it mattered.
6. Stephen Harper. Dude looked good after the apparent steam rolling he got. He knew what questions where coming his way, and responded to the criticisms by the other Parlimentarians rather well from what I saw. He dodged a few Bullets I'm sure Canadians would have rather had answered, but he remained steadfast in his ways. He outlined what the country has become in his short tenure as PM. He defended and even hit out at some of the things levied against him. He didnt have to do much, he wans't going to win or lose the election last night, so he remained calm for the most part and gave pre-planned answers in a safe and monotone way. I would have liked to see a platform from Harper, but does he need one right now? Many have pegged him with a huge margin victory from last night.
If anything last night, the Tories won on a couple fronts. There are two types of voters in Canada at this point. The first is the ones that know it will be a Torie Government. This will affect their voting, as some may not even do so. This hinders the Liberals and the NDP who would like to see those votes come their way. In turn this helps the Tories because they aren't losing any votes to the Liberals or the NDP. Pretty Simple, no?
The second train of thought is that the race is close. Close is good for all parties, but it helps the Tories out again, as long as these swing voters agree that the Liberal party is in shambles, this swing vote will go to a more compotent party, one that wont be calling another election or changing leaders in the next year. Moreso, if votes go the NDP way, then the Liberals will lose those votes. This is a two horse race, and most Liberals second vote would go to the NDP if not satisfied with their own party. This just helps the Majority that the Tories are yearning for.
I rather enjoyed the debate, i havent seen the numbers yet as far as viewers go, but i would hope that Canadians took some interest in what they complain about.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)